Charges of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) are grave violations that may have a lifelong impact on the offender. The validity of the evidence obtained from breathalyzer and field sobriety tests is an important factor in DUI cases. DUI lawyers are essential in contesting the findings of these tests, using a range of legal tactics to protect their clients. This article will discuss the methods a DUI attorney may use to contest the findings of field sobriety and breathalyzer tests.
Knowing How to Use a Breathalyzer
One frequent tool for determining a person’s blood alcohol level (BAC) at the moment of arrest is the Breathalyzer test. These tests, however, are not infallible and are prone to mistakes and inaccuracies. DUI lawyers might contest breathalyzer findings by raising issues with the calibration and maintenance records of the machine. Inaccurate measurements might result from improper maintenance or calibration of the test apparatus. Attorneys may also look at whether the test-administering officer followed protocol and had the necessary training.
Examining the Accuracy of Field Sobriety Measures
Physical evaluations called field sobriety tests are used to determine a driver’s level of intoxication. The walk-and-turn, one-leg stand, and horizontal gaze nystagmus are common tests. These tests are subjective and might be affected by weather, physical state, and anxiety. These conditions may have caused field sobriety tests to provide false impairment assessments, which DUI lawyers may argue against.
Observations of the Questioning Officer
When assessing whether a motorist is intoxicated, the arresting officer’s observations are often quite important. By closely examining the officer’s actions during the traffic stop, DUI lawyers can refute these findings. They may challenge the officer’s justification for pulling the motorist over, if correct processes were followed, and whether prejudices impacted their decision. The credibility of the evidence acquired might be questioned by pointing out any discrepancies in the officer’s statement.
Making Use of Expert Witnesses
To refute the findings of breathalyzer and field sobriety tests, DUI lawyers often call on expert witnesses. These specialists could be knowledgeable in fields like toxicology, forensic science, or breathalyzer mechanics. DUI lawyers might emphasize testing errors by offering expert testimony to provide alternate interpretations of the facts.
Arrangements for Plea Bargains
The charges may not always be completely dropped if the breathalyzer and field sobriety test findings are contested. Instead, DUI lawyers could concentrate on reaching plea agreements that might lead to less fines or other sentence choices. Attorneys may work to get the best result for their clients by using their legal experience and understanding of the regional legal system.
Conclusion
A qualified DUI attorney is necessary for the difficult work of contesting the findings of breathalyzer and field sobriety tests. To develop a strong case, these lawyers dispute the testing equipment’s accuracy, examine officer observations, and use expert witnesses. DUI lawyers are essential to securing justice and a fair trial for anyone charged with DUI.